Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD006626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006626.pub2
Methods Allocation: random, no further details.
Blindness: double, no further details.
Duration: 12 weeks.
Design: parallel.
Location: multicentre.
Setting: not specified.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (DMS-IV).
N = 321.
Sex: 250 M, 71 F.
Age: 18-55 years (mean ~ 39).
History: duration ill not specified, mean age at onset - 22 years, treatment resistance, PANSS total score ≧ 60
Interventions
  1. Sertindole: flexible dose (permitted range 12-24 mg/day, mean 18.1). N = 216.

  2. Risperidone: flexible dose (permitted range 6-12 mg/day, mean 9). N = 105

Outcomes Leaving study early: any reason, adverse events, inefficacy.
Mental State: PANSS total score.
Adverse effects/event: at least one adverse effect, QTc prolongation, cholesterol, extrapyramidal effects (akathisia, parkinsonism, AIMS, BAS, SAS), glucose, sexual dysfunction, sedation, weight
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Random, no further details.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk No further details.
Blinding?
subjective outcomes
Unclear risk Double, no further details. Whether blinding was successful has not been examined. Both compounds differ substantially in side effects which can be a problem for blinding
Blinding?
objective outcomes
Low risk Objective outcomes such as laboratory measures or death are unlikely to have been much affected by problems of blinding
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
High risk Data on reason for drop-out were available but total numbers was considerably high (32.4%). The LOCF method was used to account for people leaving the study early. It assumes that a participant who discontinued the study would not have had a change of his condition if he had remained in the study. This assumption can obviously be wrong
Free of selective reporting? High risk Only those adverse events that occurred in at least 10% of the participants were reported. This procedure can miss rare, but important adverse events
Free of other bias? High risk The study was sponsored by the manufacturer of sertindole.