Methods | Allocation: random, no further details. Blindness: double, no further details. Duration: 12 weeks. Design: parallel. Location: multicentre. Setting: not specified. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (DMS-IV). N = 321. Sex: 250 M, 71 F. Age: 18-55 years (mean ~ 39). History: duration ill not specified, mean age at onset - 22 years, treatment resistance, PANSS total score ≧ 60 |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | Leaving study early: any reason, adverse events, inefficacy. Mental State: PANSS total score. Adverse effects/event: at least one adverse effect, QTc prolongation, cholesterol, extrapyramidal effects (akathisia, parkinsonism, AIMS, BAS, SAS), glucose, sexual dysfunction, sedation, weight |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear risk | Random, no further details. |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | No further details. |
Blinding? subjective outcomes |
Unclear risk | Double, no further details. Whether blinding was successful has not been examined. Both compounds differ substantially in side effects which can be a problem for blinding |
Blinding? objective outcomes |
Low risk | Objective outcomes such as laboratory measures or death are unlikely to have been much affected by problems of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes |
High risk | Data on reason for drop-out were available but total numbers was considerably high (32.4%). The LOCF method was used to account for people leaving the study early. It assumes that a participant who discontinued the study would not have had a change of his condition if he had remained in the study. This assumption can obviously be wrong |
Free of selective reporting? | High risk | Only those adverse events that occurred in at least 10% of the participants were reported. This procedure can miss rare, but important adverse events |
Free of other bias? | High risk | The study was sponsored by the manufacturer of sertindole. |