Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 5;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-89

Table 4.

Unadjusted prevalence (% with CI) of diabetes and obesity according to types of vegetarian diet consumption in adult Indian population (n = 156,317) aged 20–49 years, NFHS 2005-06

Characteristics Type of diets P for trend values*
Vegan Lacto-vegetarian Lacto-ovo vegetarian Pesco-vegetarian Semi-vegetarian Non-vegetarian
Diabetes 26 [1.0] 356 [0.9] 46 [0.9] 48 [1.4] 71 [0.9] 1223 [1.2] 0.002
N [%], 95% CI 0.6-1.7 0.8-1.1 0.6-1.3 1.0-2.0 0.7-1.1 1.1-1.3
BMI ≥23 kg/m2 534 [21.5] 9722 [26.9] 1163 [24.9] 650 [19.5] 1690 [21.8] 21380 [22.6] <0.001
N [%], 95% CI 19.5-23.7 26.3-27.5 23.4-26.5 17.8-21.3 20.7-23.0 22.3-23.0
BMI ≥25 kg/m2 286 [11.5] 5861 [16.2] 697 [14.9] 334 [10.0] 877 [11.3] 11996 [12.7] <0.001
N [%], 95% CI 10.0-13.2 15.7-16.7 13.7-16.3 8.0-11.3 10.5-12.2 12.4-13.0
BMI ≥30 kg/m2 58 [2.3] 1311 [3.6] 140 [3.0] 56 [1.7] 156 [1.6] 2269 [2.4] <0.001
N [%], 95% CI 1.7-3.2 3.4-3.9 2.5-3.7 1.2-2.4 1.2-2.4 2.3-2.5
BMI, mean [±SD] 20.5 [±4.2] 21.2 [±4.5] 21.0 [±4.1] 20.3 [±3.8] 20.6 [±4.0] 20.7 [±4.1]

*P for trend values has been obtained from Likelihood ratio test for no difference between the groups for types of vegetarian diet ignoring the correlated data. As the non-vegetarian group was expected to have the highest and the rural group the lowest levels of diabetes and BMI, trend tests were carried out scoring the groups 1 to 5 and using likelihood ratio tests.