Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
Breath odour | |||||
RCT 4-armed trial |
99 people |
Mean odour score change from baseline (assessed on a scale from 0 [no halitosis] to 5 [offensive halitosis])
at 4 weeks
–0.41 with mouthwash containing cetylpyridinium chloride (used twice-daily) +0.06 with chlorine dioxide plus zinc mouthwash (used twice-daily) 0 with essential oil mouthwash |
P value (among the 3 treatment groups) reported as not significant 4 people were excluded or withdrew after randomisation Analysis not by intention-to-treat |
Not significant | |
RCT 3-armed trial |
48 people |
Organoleptic breath scores
4 weeks
with regular-use mouthwash containing zinc chloride plus sodium chlorite with regular-use mouthwash containing zinc chloride only Absolute results reported graphically |
Reported as significant for zinc chloride plus sodium chlorite mouthwash v zinc chloride alone mouthwash P value not reported |
Effect size not calculated | regular-use mouthwash containing zinc chloride plus sodium chlorite |
RCT 4-armed trial |
174 people |
Mean odour score change from baseline
day 21
with amine fluoride/stannous fluoride, zinc lactate, oral malodour counteractives mouthwash with chlorhexidine, cetylpyridinium chloride, and zinc lactate mouthwash with chlorhexidine mouthwash Absolute results reported graphically |
Reported as not significant |
Not significant | |
RCT |
22 people |
Proportion of individuals with organoleptic scores 1 or less
1 week
64% with chlorine dioxide mouthwash plus tongue scraping 81% with chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash plus tongue scraping Absolute numbers not reported |
Reported as not significant |
Not significant |