Skip to main content
. 2014 May 13;2(2):195–209. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00027

TABLE 2. Cesarean Delivery Rate by Year of Survey and Background Characteristics, Weighted Percentages.

Characteristics 2002 2007 2012
% P Value % P Value % P Value Percentage Point Differencea P Value for Trendb
Overall Rate 18.2 20.1 30.3
Age, y .001 <.001 <.001 .53
 15–19 14.5 20.3 22.2 7.7
 20–24 14.6 11.1 25.2 10.6
 25–29 15.5 16.9 28.0 12.5
 ≥ 30 20.5 24.0 32.8 12.3
Place of Residence .33 .45 .12 .74
 Urban 18.6 20.3 30.7 12.1
 Rural 17.0 19.2 28.4 11.4
Geographic Region .008 .18 .06 .37
 Central 19.7 20.2 31.2 11.5
 North 15.1 19.1 28.2 13.1
 South 17.3 22.7 30.9 13.6
Mother's Education .01 .001 <.001 .75
 No education 22.0 24.5 23.5 1.5
 Primary 23.1 24.9 40.2 17.1
 Secondary 16.6 18.6 29.0 12.4
 Higher 19.9 22.0 31.3 11.4
Partner's Education .13 .44 <.001 .48
 No education 23.1 20.7 28.8 5.7
 Primary 16.9 21.5 33.0 16.1
 Secondary 17.3 19.4 28.1 10.8
 Higher 20.3 20.9 34.6 14.3
Employment .02 <.001 <.001 .02
 Unemployed 17.7 19.4 28.5 10.8
 Employed 22.6 24.8 40.1 17.5
Place of Delivery .004 .005 .02 .53
 Public sector 16.8 19.0 29.4 12.6
 Private sector 20.8 22.0 32.2 11.4
Wealth Index .18 <.001 <.001 .47
 Poorest 17.4 17.0 28.8 11.4
 Poorer 16.3 17.1 25.4 9.1
 Middle 18.1 19.2 33.3 15.2
 Richer 20.0 24.0 31.0 11.0
 Richest 21.1 26.5 34.0 12.9
Parity in Last 5 Years <.001 .02 .01 .01
 1 20.1 21.3 30.0 9.9
 2 14.8 18.5 29.5 14.7
 ≥ 3 20.6 18.4 36.6 16.0
Age at First Birth, y <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001
 12–18 16.9 16.8 24.3 7.4
 19–24 16.7 17.0 27.0 10.3
 25–30 20.3 28.2 34.5 14.2
 > 30 43.9 38.5 66.9 23.0
Birth Weight, g <.001 <.001 <.001 .85
 Normal (2500–3999) 16.3 18.1 28.4 12.1
 Low/High (< 2500 or ≥ 4000) 24.2 27.1 36.6 12.4
Birth Multiplicity <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001
 Singleton birth 17.3 19.3 29.5 12.2
 Multiple birth 60.0 59.3 65.7 5.7
a

Percentage point difference between 2002 and 2012.

b

P value for the trend was obtained from logistic regression models by using outcome and explanatory variables as continuous variables and including interaction terms between survey year and each tested explanatory variable for the years 2002 and 2012.