Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 19;5:983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00983

Table 1.

Goodness of fit of maximum likelihood with robust standard errors (MLR) full and partial invariance models.

Invariance model SBχ2 df p SCF RMSEA CFI TLI cd TRd Δdf p Mean difference estimate Simulation Bias
α SE p d AVG SD SE avg 95% Cover % Sig. M bias (%) SE Bias (%)
Configural no CUs 97.948 76 0.046 1.112 0.026 0.973 0.967
Configural with CUs 82.052 69 0.135 1.111 0.021 0.984 0.979 1.112 15.889 7 0.026
Weak with CUs 90.371 76 0.125 1.115 0.021 0.982 0.979 1.154 8.319 7 0.305
Strong with CUs 127.238 82 0.001 1.108 0.036 0.944 0.937 1.017 39.534 6 <0.001 −0.341 0.070 <0.001 0.25 −0.344 0.072 0.068 0.938 0.998 0.79 −5.58
Partial1 with CUs 108.190 81 0.024 1.110 0.028 0.966 0.962 0.946 22.081 1 <0.001
Partial2* with CUs 94.677 80 0.126 1.110 0.021 0.982 0.979 1.110 13.513 1 <0.001 −0.502 0.075 <0.001 0.35 −0.505 0.079 0.075 0.945 1.000 0.56 −4.20

SBχ2, Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square; df, degrees of freedom; SCF, Scaling Correction Factor; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; cd, difference test scaling correction; TRd, Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square difference test; Δdf, degrees of freedom difference; CU, correlated uniquenesses;

Intercept of item 4 was not invariant;

*

Intercepts of items 3 and 4 were not invariant. SB scaled chi-square difference tests are referred to the model in the above line.