Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 18;6(3):118–124. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.3.4

Table I.

Studies reporting interventional SMA treatment

Author, year, patients Vessels Age (y),
sex (%)
Technical (techn.), clinical (clin.) success, morbidity, mortality Patency rate Pure PTA / stent
Pietura, 2002,
(n = 6) [17]
TC 4, SMA 5 46–73 y,
5 m (83%)
100%
morbidity/mortality: 0
no restenosis after 12–18 months only one stenting after unsuccessful PTA
AbuRahma, 2003,
(n = 22) [18]
TC 12, SMA 8,
both 2
69.2 (52–88) y,
3 m (14%)
96%/95%
mortality: 0
30% after mean 26 months all PTA/stent
Sharafuddin, 2003,
(n = 25) [19]
TC 11, SMA 18 66 (41–86) y,
13 m (52%)
96%/88%
morbidity: 10%, 30 d mortality: 4%
6 months: 92% all PTA/stent
Chahid, 2004,
(n = 14) [10]
TC 3, SMA 8,
both 3
53 (32–74) y,
6 m (43%)
100%/100%
morbidity: 14%, mortality: 0
14% after mean 29 months 9 : 5
Lee, 2008,
(n = 31) [13]
TC 15, SMA 26 70 (43–90) y,
5 m (16%)
techn.: 97.5%
morbidity: 6%, 30 d mortality: 14%
1 year: 85% no restenosis
Sarac, 2008,
(n = 65) [15]
TC 23, SMA 57, IMA 7 70 (44–89) y,
29 m (45%)
clin.: 85%
morbidity: 31%, 30 d mortality: 8%
1 year: 65% all PTA/stent
Zerbib, 2008,
(n = 14) [20]
TC 2, SMA 12 75.4 ± 10.1 y,
8 m (57.2%)
92.8%
morbidity: 21%, 3 mon. mortality: 14.2%
primary restenosis 21.4% after PTA, pain relief at the end of the study 71.4% 3 : 11 s
Daliri, 2010,
(n = 17) [21]
TC 13, SMA 13 65 (31–89) y,
4 m (24%)
100%/88%mortality: 18% 1 year: 81%,
reintervention rate 30%
13 : 13
Fioole, 2010,
(n = 51) [22]
TC 30, SMA 24, IMA 6 64 ± 11 y,
26 m (51%)
93%/78%
morbidity: 4%, 30 d mortality: 0
1 year: 86%
2 years: 60%
All PTA/stent
Jung, 2011,
(n = 18) [23]
TC 6, SMA 16, IMA 1 61.5 (43–84) y, 13 m (72%) 3× recurrence after 6/8/8 months 94% PTA/stent
Turba, 2012,
(n = 166) [24]
TC 66, SMA 120, IMA 35 69 (40–94) y,
54 m (33%)
97%/88.2%
morbidity: 3.6%, 30 d mortality: 3%
1 year: CT, SMA, IMA 85%, 88%, 84% 50 : 165