Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 8;5(3):418–431. doi: 10.4161/mabs.24291

Table 2. Comparison of Chi1 torsion angle of Cλ and Cκ cysteine residues involved in Lc-Hc disulfide bond from the complete hIgG1 Fab structures.

PDB ID Lc
Isotype
Cys1
chain
Cys1
residue
Chi1
(°)
Chi1 of the closest rotamer (°) Deviation from the Chi1 of the closest rotamer (ΔChi1, °)
1AQK λ L 215 −130.87 −177.00 46.13
2HWZ κ L 213 179.32 −177.00 3.68
2R0L κ L 214 −54.79 −65.00 10.21
1Y0L κ L 214 174.94 −177.00 8.06
1FVE κ C 214 −178.97 −177.00 1.97
1RHH κ C 213 163.50 −177.00 19.50
1AJ7 κ L 214 −61.07 −65.00 3.93
2EH7 κ L 214 −174.63 −177.00 2.37
1FVD κ C 214 64.82 55.00 9.82
1B2W κ L 214 −175.33 −177.00 1.67
2OSL κ L 213 72.52 55.00 17.52
1DFB κ L 212 165.57 −177.00 17.43
1T3F κ A 214 −95.76 −65.00 30.76

The PDB entries were obtained from the disulfide bond database analysis in Table 1. The Chi1 angle calculation was performed using the rotamer database from program Coot.37