Methods | Allocation: random, no further details. Blindness: single, no further details. Duration: 24 weeks. Design: parallel. Location: not described. Country: not reported. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: chronic schizophrenia. N=80. Age: mean ~ 50.2 years, range not described. Sex: 39M, 41F. History: duration illness not described, age of onset not described. Setting: not described. |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | Leaving the study early: any reason. Cognitive functioning: Wisconsin card sorting test. Unable to use - Mental state: BPRS change (no data). Adverse effects: BAS, SAS, UKU (no data). |
|
Notes | There are control groups without further details provided. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear risk | Random, no further details. |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | No further details. |
Blinding? Objective outcomes |
Low risk | Objective outcomes such as laboratory measures or death are unlikely to have been much affected by problems of blinding |
Blinding? Subjective outcomes |
Unclear risk | Single, no further details. Whether blinding was successful has not been examined, but both compounds differ quite substantially in side-effects. This can be a problem for blinding |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes |
Low risk | The rate of leaving the study early was low (5%), data on reasons for drop-out were provided. All data were analysed on an intent to treat basis with the last-observation-carried forward-method. This method is not perfect, but due to the very low attrition, the risk of bias was low |
Free of selective reporting? | High risk | The study is only available as an abstract. Data on BPRS and EPS scales were not available |
Free of other bias? | Unclear risk | Insufficient data to judge on baseline imbalance or industry sponsoring |