Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD006654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006654.pub2
Methods Allocation: random, no further details.
Blindness: single (rater-blinded).
Duration: 16 weeks (8 weeks observed).
Design: parallel.
Location: multicentre.
Country: not reported.
Participants Diagnosis: (DSM-IV) schizophrenia, PANSS total score of 70 or more, PANSS positive subscore of 4 or more on at least 2 items.
N=75.
Age: 18-65 years.
Sex: not reported.
History: duration ill not reported, age at onset not reported.
Setting: inpatient.
Interventions
  1. Olanzapine: flexible dose. Allowed dose range: 10-20 mg/day. Mean dose: 14.6 mg/day. N=25.

  2. Quetiapine: flexible dose. Allowed dose range: 400-800 mg/day. Mean dose: 602.4 mg/day. N=25.

  3. Risperidone: flexible dose. Allowed dose range: 4-8 mg/day. Mean dose: 4.3 mg/day. N=25

Outcomes Leaving the study early: any reason.
Mental State: BPRS hostility cluster score.
Adverse effects: EPS (BAS, SAS), weight gain.
Unable to use-
Mental State - PANSS total score, PANSS positive subscore, PANSS negative subscore (no usable data)
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Random, no further details.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk No further details.
Blinding?
Objective outcomes
Low risk Objective outcomes such as laboratory measures or death are unlikely to have been much affected by problems of blinding
Blinding?
Subjective outcomes
Unclear risk Single, rater-blind. Whether blinding was successful has not been examined, but the compounds differ quite substantially in side-effects. This can be a problem for blinding
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Unclear risk The attrition rate was moderate (18. 6%). The last-observation-carried-forward method was used to account for people leaving the study early. It assumes that a participant who discontinued the study would not have had a change of his condition if he had remained in the study. This assumption can obviously be wrong. It is unclear whether this led to bias
Free of selective reporting? High risk Efficacy data (PANSS) were only presented as per cent change, without indications of standard deviations, standard errors, p-values or ranges. Only interim data after half the patients had been recruited have been presented
Free of other bias? High risk The study was sponsored by the manufacturer of quetiapine.