Table 3.
Meta-regression analysis to determine sources of heterogeneity for all 11 studies and subgroup of all prospective studies
Covariate | coefficient | p-value | RDOR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Meta-analysis | ||||
Sex (ratio of male vs. female) | −1.23 | 0.81 | 0.29 | (0.0, >1000) |
Sample size | 0.09 | 0.31 | 1.09 | (0.89, 1.33) |
Design (prospective vs. retrospective) | 0.24 | 0.94 | 1.27 | (0.0, >1000) |
Center (multi-center vs. single center) | −8.72 | 0.26 | 0 | (0.0, >1000) |
Country (America vs. non-America) | −1.73 | 0.75 | 0.18 | (0.0, >1000) |
Needle size* | −0.95 | 0.49 | 0.39 | (0.02, 8.48) |
Subgroup (Prospective Studies) Analysis | ||||
Sex (ratio of male vs. female) | 22.3 | 0.2 | >1000 | (0,>1000) |
Sample size | −0.06 | 0.18 | 0.94 | (0.75, 1.17) |
Center (multi-center vs. single center) | −3.91 | 0.17 | 0.02 | (0,>1000) |
Country (America vs. non-America) | −5.61 | 0.48 | 0 | (0,>1000) |
Needle size | 1.65 | 0.55 | 5.19 | (0, >1000) |
based on uni-variate meta-regression and reduced data (centers = 10)