Table 2. Comparison of GWAS and linkage genotypic datasets.
| Dataset | Family | Line | SNP1 | SNP2 | SNP3 | SNP4 | SNP5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWAS | A | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| A | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| A | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Linkage | A | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 |
| A | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| A | 3 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| B | 1 | 1 | 1.34 | 1.67 | 2 | 2 | |
| B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Five hypothetical, equidistant SNPs from two families are presented. SNPs monomorphic within families are shown in bold and are imputed as the mean of the two flanking markers in the joint linkage dataset