Table 5. Parameter estimates and variance components of the HLM models tested (Study 2).
Fixed effects | Random effects | |||||||||||||||||||
Model equations | ||||||||||||||||||||
Intercept-only model (empty model) | ||||||||||||||||||||
4.12** | - | - | - | - | - | .19 | .10 | .17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Model 1a | ||||||||||||||||||||
4.11** | −.20** | .03 | - | - | - | .17 | .12 | .16 | ns | ns | ns | ns | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Model 1b | ||||||||||||||||||||
4.10** | −.27** | .16 | −.10 | −.20 | .34* | .15 | .04 | .19 | ns | ns | ns | ns | .27 | ns | - | - | - | - | ||
Note: **p<.01 (two-tailed); *p<.05 (two-tailed); † p<.10 (two-tailed); Per = performance; WP = work pressure; N = neuroticism.