Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 12;22(10):1208–1216. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.310

Table 2. Mean ancestry fraction and 95% CIs in controls, adenomas, adenocarcinomas and admixed population (MEX and ASW) included into the analysis.

  Ancestry fraction
  European Amerindiana African
Group/population
Mean (95% CI)
Mean (95% CI)
Meanb (95% CI)
Controls (n=238) 0.39 (0.38–0.41) 0.45 (0.43–0.46) 0.11 (0.10–0.12)
Adenoma (n=115) 0.44*** (0.42–0.46) 0.39*** (0.37–0.41) 0.13* (0.11–0.15)
Cancer (n=190) 0.38 (0.37–0.40) 0.43 (0.41–0.45) 0.14** (0.12–0.16)
MEX (n=77) 0.48 (0.45–0.51) 0.48 (0.45–0.51) 0.04 (0.03–0.05)
 Ref valuec 0.5 0.45 0.05
ASW (n=83) 0.18 (0.15–0.20) 0.05 (0.04–0.07) 0.77 (0.75–0.79)
 Ref valuec 0.2 0.8

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; ASW, African ancestry in Southwest USA; CHB, Han Chinese in Beijing, China; CI, confidence interval; MEX, Mexican ancestry from Los Angeles.

P-value for one-way ANOVA test: ***<0.001, **<0.01 and *<0.1*.

a

Based on CHB reference population.

b

Back transformated from log.

c

Seldin et al.27