Table 1. Outcome data and odds ratios.

	CBT		Waiting list		Followed-up cases		Intent-to-treat cases
Study	WD	R/FU	WD	R/FU	Odds ratio (95% CI)	Log odds ratio	Odds ratio (95% CI)	Log odds ratio
Cobham (2012)	0	18/23	2	0/12	86.4 (4.31 – 1730.98)	4.46	25.2 (4.24 – 149.79)	3.07
Spence (2011)	4	13/40	3	1/24	11.07 (1.34 – 91.21)	2.40	2.41 (0.70 – 8.36)	0.88
Hirshfeld-Becker(2011)	5	17/29	2	5/28	6.52 (1.93 – 22.01)	1.87	3.29 (1.12 – 9.68)	1.19
Lau (2010)	3	13/20	4	0/21	78 (4.08 – 1492.19)	4.36	6.83 (1.77 – 26.33)	1.92
March (2009)	10	9/30	4	3/29	3.71 (0.89 – 15.48)	1.31	1.08 (0.353 – 3.29)	0.08
Waters (2009)	15	39/49*	0	2/11*	17.55 (3.26 – 94.38)	2.87	7.02 (1.40 – 35.20)	1.95
Bodden (2008)	14	71/114	0	0/25	82.56 (4.90 – 1391.86)	4.41	62.28 (3.71 – 1045.93)	4.13
Walkup (2008)	19	196/279*	15	18/76*	7.61 (4.23 – 13.70)	2.03	3.38 (2.07 – 5.51)	1.22
Rapee (2006)	14	46/76	12	5/75	21.47 (7.76 – 59.37)	3.07	5.04 (2.59 – 9.82)	1.62
Spence (2006)	4	27/45	0	3/23	10 (2.59 – 38.66)	2.30	8.18 (2.15 – 31.18)	2.10
Bernstein (2005)	5	19/37	0	6/24	3.17 (1.03 – 9.77)	1.15	2.48 (0.82 – 7.49)	0.91
Nauta (2003)	0	32/59	0	2/20	10.67 (2.27 – 50.16)	2.37	10.67 (2.27 – 50.16)	2.37
Shortt (2001)	1	33/53	5	1/12	18.15 (2.18 – 151.38)	2.90	2.88 (0.93 – 8.97)	1.06
Flannery-Schroeder (2000)	6*	17/31	0*	0/12	29.14 (1.58 – 538.22)	3.37	20.4 (1.12 – 371.46)	3.02
Silverman (1999)	12	16/25	3	2/16	12.44 (2.29 – 67.56)	2.52	2.13 (0.64 – 7.16)	0.76
Barrett (1998)	6	25/34	4	4/16	8.33 (2.13 – 32.60)	2.12	2.5 (0.83 – 7.51)	0.92
Kendall (1997)	13*	25/47*	11*	2/23*	11.93 (2.51 – 56.75)	2.48	1.15 (0.49 – 2.73)	0.14
Dadds (1997)	1	27/41	1	27/52	1.79 (0.77 – 4.15)	0.58	1.61 (0.70 – 3.69)	0.47
Barrett (1996)	0	37/53	3	6/23	6.55 (2.18 – 19.68)	1.88	4.37 (1.61 – 11.85)	1.47
Kendall (1994)	2*	16/25*	0	1/20	33.78 (3.8 – 295.95)	3.52	27.64 (3.21 – 237.83)	3.32
Pooled	134	696/1110	69	88/542	8.62 (6.65 – 11.16)	2.15	3.65 (2.95 – 4.52)	1.29

^*Data extrapolated from other information in the paper.

Notes: WD = withdrawn; R/FU = recovery of those followed-up.