. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun 6;30(7):1339–1346. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0459-z

Table 3.

Regression models for prediction of rate of change in T₁ for LGE− subjects

Parameter	Model 1: minimally adjusted^*			Model 2: final Model
Parameter	Regression coefficient (ms)^§	95 % CI	p value	Regression coefficient (ms)^§	95 % CI	p value
Age (years)	−0.07	[−1.53 1.39]	0.93	–	–	–
Gender (reference = female	−23.4	[−72.4 25.6]	0.35	–	–	–
BMI (kg/m²)^†	−1.82	[−5.95 2.32]	0.39	–	–	–
End systolic volume index (mL/m²)^‡	0.45	[−0.59 1.50]	0.40	2.1	[0.2 4.0]	0.029^\|\|
Stroke volume index (mL/m²)^‡	−0.59	[−2.36 1.19]	0.52	–	–	–
End diastolic volume index (mL/m²)^‡	0.05	[−0.66 0.77]	0.88	–	–	–
Ejection fraction (%)	−2.09	[−4.84 0.67]	0.14	–	–	–
LV mass index (g/m²)^‡	−0.44	[−1.60 0.72]	0.45	−2.03	[−3.91 −0.14]	0.035^\|\|
M/V (g/mL)^†	−24	[−145 97]	0.70	–	–	–

Adjusted for age and gender

^†

BMI = body mass index; M/V = Left Ventricular mass/volume ratio

^‡

Indexed parameters were normalized by BSA, which was calculated using DuBois formula

^§

Regression coefficient is expressed in (ms/g) for LV Mass, (ms/mL) for volume parameters, (ms/%) for EF, (ms/g/m²) for LV Mass Index

^||

Bold indicates p < 0.05