Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.pub2
Methods Parallel-group, multicentre study (40 centres in Canada)
Jadad quality score = 4
Participants Symptomatic asthmatic adults
% ELIGIBLE OF SCREENED POPULATION: Not reported
% RUN-IN PARTICIPANTS RANDOMISED: Not reported
RANDOMISED: 237 (FP/SAL: 121; FP: 116)
WITHDRAWALS: FP/SAL: 4; FP: 7
AGE mean: 37
GENDER (% male): 35
SEVERITY: Moderate
BASELINE % PREDICTED FEV1 (mean): Not reported
BASELINE DOSE OF ICS: 100 mcg/d FP
ASTHMA DURATION: Not reported
ATOPY (%): Not reported
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: >= 12 years of age; symptomatic despite low doses of ICS (<= 500 mcg/d or equivalent of BUD) for less than 4 weeks (criterion for run-in phase - participants who met the above criterion but had been on ICS for longer bypassed the run-in phase); symptomatic at end of run-in phase (on low-dose FP)
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: < 60% or > 90% predicted of PEF at visit 1
Interventions LABA + ICS versus INCREASED dose of FP
OUTCOMES - TIMING 12 weeks
RUN-IN: 2 weeks
DOSE OF ICS DURING RUN-IN: 100 mcg/d FP
INTERVENTION PERIOD: 12 weeks
TEST GROUP: Combination fluticasone and salmeterol 100/50 bid
CONTROL GROUP: Fluticasone 250 mcg bid
DEVICE: Metered dose inhaler
NUMBER OF DEVICES: 1
COMPLIANCE: Not assessed
CO-TREATMENT: prn SABA
Outcomes PULMONARY FUNCTION TEST: am PEF*; pm PEF; FEV1
SYMPTOM SCORES: Not reported
FUNCTIONAL STATUS: Not reported
INFLAMMATORY MARKERS: Not reported
ADVERSE EFFECTS: Reported
WITHDRAWALS: Reported
Primary outcome measure*
Notes Unpublished full data-set available from http://www.ctr.gsk.co.uk
Source of funding: GSK
Confirmation of methodology and data: Not obtained
User defined number: 1000
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Yes See Appendix 3
Allocation concealment? Yes See Appendix 3
Blinding?
All outcomes
Yes Identical inhaler devices used
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Unclear “The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was used for all analyses including demographic, efficacy, safety and health outcome endpoints. This population consisted of all subjects who entered the study and were randomised to treatment.”
Free of selective reporting? Yes Moderate exacerbations used as proxy for steroid-treated exacerbations (see Analysis 3.1)