Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.pub2
Methods Parallel-group, multicentre study (61 centres in UK)
Jadad quality score = 4
Participants Moderately severe steroid using asthmatic adults
% ELIGIBLE OF SCREENED POPULATION: Not reported
% RUN-IN PARTICIPANTS RANDOMISED: Not reported
RANDOMISED: 68 (FP/SAL: 35; BDP: 33)
WITHDRAWALS: FP/SAL: 10; BDP: 10
AGE: mean: 44
GENDER (% male): 50
SEVERITY: Moderate
BASELINE % PREDICTED FEV1 (mean): 75
BASELINE DOSE OF ICS: 400 to 500 mcg/d BDP
ASTHMA DURATION: Not reported
ATOPY (%): Not reported
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: >= 12 years of age; 400-500 mcg/d BDP equivalent; >= 50% < 85% predicted PEF during run-in; relief medication on >= 2 occasions on 3 of last 7 days; >= 2 on symptom scores on 3 of last 7 days on baseline OR >= 1 on night symptoms during same period
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Not reported
Interventions LABA + ICS versus INCREASED dose ICS
OUTCOMES: TIMING 12 weeks
RUN-IN: 2 weeks
DOSE OF ICS DURING RUN-IN: Current ICS treatment
INTERVENTION PERIOD: 12 weeks
TEST GROUP: Combination fluticasone and salmeterol 100/50 mcg bid
CONTROL GROUP: Beclomethasone 400 mcg bid
DEVICE: FP/SAL: Evohaler; BDP: Accuhaler
NUMBER OF DEVICES: 1 (double-dummy design meant that participants given 2 inhalers)
COMPLIANCE: Not assessed
CO-TREATMENT: prn SABA
Outcomes PULMONARY FUNCTION TEST: am PEF*; pm PEF
SYMPTOM SCORES: Percentage symptom-free days*
FUNCTIONAL STATUS: Rescue medication usage; health-related quality of life (AQLQ)
INFLAMMATORY MARKERS: Not reported
ADVERSE EFFECTS: Reported
WITHDRAWALS: Reported
Primary outcome measures*
Notes Unpublished full data set available from http://www.ctr.gsk.co.uk
Source of funding: GSK
Confirmation of methodology and data: Obtained for methods
User defined number: 800
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Yes See Appendix 3
Allocation concealment? Yes See Appendix 3
Blinding?
All outcomes
Yes Double-dummy design
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Unclear “The intention-to-treat (ITT) sample was used for the efficacy and safety analyses. This consisted of all subjects randomised to and receiving at least one dose of study medication.”
Free of selective reporting? Yes OCS-treated exacerbations available on request from study sponsor