Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.pub2
Methods Parallel-group, multicentre study (79 centres in Canada)
Jadad quality score = 4
Participants Controlled moderately severe asthmatic adults
% ELIGIBLE OF SCREENED POPULATION: 71
% RUN-IN PARTICIPANTS RANDOMISED: Not reported
RANDOMISED: 483 (FP/SAL: 242; FP: 241)
WITHDRAWALS: FP/SAL: 43; FP: 41
AGE: mean: 39
GENDER (% male): 42
SEVERITY: Moderate
BASELINE % PREDICTED FEV1: Not reported
BASELINE DOSE OF ICS: >= BUD 400 mcg/d or equivalent
ASTHMA DURATION: Not reported
ATOPY (%): Not reported
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: 12 to 70 years of age; clinical diagnosis of persistent asthma; ability to use HFA-salbutamol as prn SABA; >= BUD 400 mcg/d or equivalent; asthma control during run-in (defined by Canadian guidelines)
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Not reported
Interventions LABA + ICS versus INCREASED dose ICS
OUTCOMES TIMING: 12 weeks
RUN-IN: 2 weeks
DOSE OF ICS DURING RUN-IN: FP 250 mcg bid
INTERVENTION PERIOD: 12 weeks
TEST GROUP: Combination fluticasone and salmeterol 100/50 mcg bid
CONTROL GROUP: Fluticasone 250 mcg bid
DEVICE: Diskus
NUMBER OF DEVICES: 1
COMPLIANCE: Not assessed
CO-TREATMENT: prn SABA
Outcomes PULMONARY FUNCTION TEST: am PEF*; pm PEF
SYMPTOM SCORES: % symptom-free days
FUNCTIONAL STATUS: Rescue medication use; nocturnal awakenings
INFLAMMATORY MARKERS: Not reported
ADVERSE EFFECTS: Reported
WITHDRAWALS: Reported
Primary outcome measure*
Notes Unpublished full data-set available from http://www.ctr.gsk.co.uk
Source of funding: GSK
Confirmation of methodology and data: Obtained for methods, not obtained for data User defined number: 1000
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Yes See Appendix 3
Allocation concealment? Yes See Appendix 3
Blinding?
All outcomes
Yes Identical inhaler devices used
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Unclear “The primary population was the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population. The ITT population was defined as subjects who were randomised and treated with at least one dose of investigational product.”
Free of selective reporting? Yes OCS-treated exacerbations available on request from study sponsor