Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.pub2
Methods Parallel-group, multicentre study (90 centres in US). Study had 2 treatment periods: fixed dosing during period 1 (up to week 12), and variable dosing in period 2 (weeks 12 to 24)
Jadad quality score = 3
Participants Stable asthmatic patients 12 years and over
% ELIGIBLE OF SCREENED POPULATION: Not reported
% RUN-IN PATIENTS RANDOMISED: 558/1596 = 35%
RANDOMISED: 558 (Salmeterol 50 bid + ICS: 281; ICS + placebo: 277)
WITHDRAWALS: S + ICS: 35; ICS: 42
AGE mean (range): 39 (12 to 77)
GENDER (% male): 42
BASELINE % PREDICTED FEV1 mean: 80.5
BASELINE DOSE OF ICS (mean): Not reported by treatment groups
BDP 400 to 800 mcgs/day; triamcinolone acetate 1200 to 1600 mcgs/day; flunisolide 1000 to 1500 mcgs/day; FP 440 to 660 mcgs/day
ASTHMA DURATION: Not reported
ATOPY (%): Not described
SMOKING STATUS: Not reported
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Asthma for at least 6 months and treated with medium dose ICS for at least 30 days before screening; baseline FEV1 of 65% to 95% normal; >= 12% improvement from baseline in lung function following inhaled bronchodilator; best FEV1 within +/− 15% of the best predose FEV1 obtained at screening; no more than 1 nighttime awakening requiring albuterol and fewer than 18 puffs albuterol during the previous week
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Pregnancy and/or lactating; life-threatening asthma; asthma hospitalisation within 3 months of screening; change in asthma regimen 30 days before screening; significant concurrent diseases including recent URTI; systemic corticosteroids in 30 days before screening
CRITERIA TO ENTER RUN-IN PERIOD 2: 20% decrease from the screening visit pre-dose FEV1; >= 20% decrease from the mean morning baseline PEF on any one of the 7 days immediately preceding the visit; total symptom score of >= 8 during any week before run-in visit; 2 or more nighttime awakenings due to asthma requiring treatment with albuterol during any week period before run-in visit
CRITERIA FOR RANDOMISATION FOLLOWING RUN-IN PERIODS: Patients who regained asthma control following step-up treatment during run-in period 2; best FEV1 >= 65% of predicted and >= 15% of the best predose FEV1 obtained at visit IA
Interventions LABA + ICS vs INCREASED dose of ICS
OUTCOMES: Reported at 1, 4, 8 and 12 and 24 weeks (only those at 12 weeks used)
DOSEOPTIMISATION PERIOD: 10 weeks; patients commenced on FP 250 mcg bid or equivalent for 2 weeks. Stable patients had their dose dropped to FP 100 bid. Patients who became unstable on this were eligible to continue. FP 250 bid was commenced and patients stable on this were eligible to continue
INTERVENTION PERIOD: 12 to 24 weeks (data at 12 weeks used)
TEST GROUP: (FP 100 bid + S 50 bid) salmeterol 50 mcg bid + fluticasone propionate 100 bid
CONTROL GROUP: Fluticasone propionate 250 bid
DEVICE: Diskhaler
NUMBER OF DEVICES: 1
COMPLIANCE: Monitored during study
CO-TREATMENT: prn SABA
Outcomes PULMONARY FUNCTION TEST: FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF
SYMPTOMSCORE: Mean change in daily symptom score (score of 0 to 5 Likert scale) FUNCTIONAL STATUS: Exacerbations (defined as any worsening of asthma that required asthma medication beyond blinded study drugs or albuterol); rescue medication use; nocturnal awakening; % rescue-free days; % symptom-free days
INFLAMMATORY MARKERS: Not assessed
ADVERSE EFFECTS: Reported
WITHDRAWALS: Reported
Primary outcome measure: proportion of patients who remained in study after 12 weeks and who did not withdraw due to lack of efficacy
Notes Full-text publication. Additional data available from GSK trials register
Funded by Glaxo Wellcome
Confirmation of methodology and data obtained
User-defined number: 600 (1000-400)
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Yes See Appendix 3
Allocation concealment? Yes See Appendix 3
Blinding?
All outcomes
Yes Identical inhaler devices
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
No Last observation carried forward:
“All analyses for efficacy and safety were conducted through use of the intent-to-treat population (all randomised patients). All data from patients who were withdrawn from the study early were included in the analyses, data available up to the time of study discontinuation being used. No interpolation was used for missing data.”
Free of selective reporting? Yes OCS-treated exacerbations available on request from GSK