Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2014 Jul 8;50(4):523–535. doi: 10.1007/s00158-014-1105-z

Table 7.

Performances of SVMs selected using different metrics on validation set for 3 cases with various sizes of training sets

SVM selected

using:
Score [95% CI]
Difference from

Ref. Lw¯ *
AUC Bacc Lw¯
Case 1 AUC 0.91 [0.88 0.93] 0.83 [0.78 0.87] −3.55 [−5.30 −2.02] 48.89%
Bacc 0.84 [0.78 0.89] 0.75 [0.70 0.80] −3.71 [−5.68 −2.00] 55.60%
Case 2 AUC 0.91 [0.88 0.94] 0.83 [0.79 0.87] −3.26 [−4.91 −1.83] 36.75%
Bacc 0.85 [0.80 0.90] 0.76 [0.71 0.81] −3.51 [−5.37 −1.93] 47.35%
Case 3 AUC 0.91 [0.88 0.94] 0.84 [0.80 0.88] −2.49 [−3.86 −1.31] 4.35%
Bacc 0.91 [0.88 0.94] 0.83 [0.79 0.87] −2.86 [−4.37 −1.53] 20.06%

1 Reference Lw¯ =−2.39 [−3.26, −1.58]