Table 3.
Bat species | Number of samples cultured | Number of positive samples | Percent | Relative riska(CI 95%) | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eidolon helvum | 79 | 12 | 15.2 | 0.95 (0.45–2.02) | 0.90 |
Epomophorus spp. | 30 | 3 | 10.0 | 0.59 (0.19–1.85) | 0.37 |
Micropterus spp. | 11 | 5 | 45.5 | 3.45 (1.59–7.53) | 0.0018b |
Chaerephon nigeriae | 16 | 0 | 0 | Not definedc | 1.27 |
Rhinolophus spp. | 12 | 3 | 25.0 | 1.709 (0.58–4.90) | 0.33 |
Relative risk was calculated by comparing proportions of positive for each bat species with the number of positive for all other bat species.
Statistically significant relative risk.
Relative risk is less than 1 but is not defined because of 0 in one of the cells.
CI, confidence interval.