Comparison 3. SUB‐ANALYSIS 1: CLUBHOUSE APPROACH (TYPE OF PVT) versus STANDARD COMMUNITY CARE.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Not in competitive employment (at 24 months)	1	215	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.95 [0.77, 1.17]
2 Not in any form of employment	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
2.1 at 3 months	1	352	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.05 [0.89, 1.24]
2.2 at 6 months	1	285	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.95 [0.81, 1.12]
2.3 at 12 months	1	215	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.95 [0.77, 1.17]
3 Admitted to hospital in first year of study	1	215	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.69 [0.49, 0.96]