Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr 23;2001(2):CD003080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003080

Bell‐Connecticut.

Methods Allocation: 'randomised' ‐ method not specified. 
 Follow up: 5 months. 
 Lost to follow‐up: 4%. 
 Objectivity of rating of outcome: independent raters.
Participants Inclusion criteria: i. diagnosis of schizophrenia or related disorder; ii. stable (no changes in drugs, housing or treatment status in month); iii. no organic brain disease or physical disability. 
 Diagnosis: schizophrenia, schizophrenia‐like disorders (100%). 
 N=150. 
 Age: mean ˜43 years. 
 Sex: 4% women. 
 Race: 31% non‐white. 
 History: ever married U/K, ever employed U/K, time since last employment U/K, previous admissions ˜8.5. 
 Setting: general hospital, Conneticut, USA.
Interventions 1. Sheltered set‐aside jobs in the hospital: i. up to 20 hours/week; ii. paid $3.4/hour; iii. worked alongside regular hospital staff in posts ranging from administrative to portering; iv. attended weekly 50 minute support group. N=80. 
 2. Control: as above but not paid. N=70. 
 Both groups continued to receive benefit entitlement.
Outcomes In any type of employment.* 
 Monthly earnings. 
 Not participating in program. 
 Rehospitalised. 
 Mental state: PANSS.
Unable to use ‐ 
 Time in any form of employment (not primary or secondary outcome variable).
Notes * People lost to follow up treated as not working. 6 patients in control group transferred to half‐way house and excluded because it had its own work program ‐ treated as working and as not dropping out.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear