Griffiths‐London.

Methods	Allocation: 'randomised' ‐ no further details. Follow up: 18 months (mean). Loss to follow up: 0%. Objectivity of rating of outcome: unclear if raters independent.
Participants	Inclusion criteria: i. psychotic illness; ii. in contact with psychiatric services during 12 month period beginning 1968; iii. age range 18‐55 years. Diagnosis: all had a psychotic illness, specific diagnoses U/K. N=28. Age: U/K. Sex: U/K. History: U/K. Setting: urban, London, UK.
Interventions	1. Rehabilitation program: i. co‐ordinated program involving day hospital and industrial workshops; ii. patients treated by team (psychiatrists, nurses, OTs, psychologists); iii. comprehensive assessment used to plan individual treatment and rehabilitation programs. N=14. 2. Control: i. referred back to doctors; ii. mainly in day centres, at home or in hosptial. N=14.
Outcomes	In competitive employment. Self esteem: Wing scale. Unable to use ‐ Cognitive functioning: WAIS. Attitude: Attitude Rating Scale (unpublished).
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Allocation concealment?	Unclear risk	B ‐ Unclear