Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr 23;2001(2):CD003080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003080

McFarlane‐New York.

Methods Allocation: 'randomly assigned' ‐ no further details. 
 Follow up: 3 monthly for 18 months, partial follow up at 24 + 30 months. 
 Lost to follow‐up: 16% at 18 months. 
 Objectivity of rating of outcome: raters independent.
Participants Inclusion criteria: i. age 18‐55; ii. family available; iii. interested in obtaining a job; iv. in treatment at site clinics; v. schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder or major depression. 
 Diagnosis: schizophrenia, schizophrenia‐like disorders (65%). 
 N=69. 
 Age: mean ˜33 years. 
 Sex: 30% women. 
 Race: 7% non‐white. 
 History: ever married 26%, ever employed U/K, time since last employment, mean ˜15 months, previous admissions, mean ˜5. 
 Setting: 2 CMHCs, 1 urban, 1 rural, New York State, USA.
Interventions 1. Family‐aided Assertive Community Treatment: i. ACT; ii. family intervention; iii. vocational specialists: specialists' tasks a. developing contacts with employers; b. case‐specific job development; c. job assessment; d. assessment of patients' cognitive, physical and social capacities; e. setting career goals; f. interview and resume practice and assistance; g. on or near job support; h. intervening with employers; i. close co‐ordination with clinicians. N=37. 
 2. Control: conventional vocational rehabilitation with referral to state VR service often leading to placement in sheltered workshop. N=32.
Outcomes Obtaining competitive employment. 
 Obtaining any form of employment. 
 Not participating in program 
 Monthly earnings.
Unable to use ‐ 
 Obtaining competitive employment at 30 months (follow up <50%) 
 Admissions to hospital per patient (not a secondary outcome). 
 Mental state (not reported by group).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear