Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD001318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub2
Methods RCT
Participants 100 women with CIN 1,2,3
Women with adequate colposcopy , no evidence of invasion, lesion no more than 5mm into canal
Interventions Laser conisation
Laser ablation
Outcomes Duration of treatment
Significant peri-operative bleeding
Women’s subjective opinion of peri-operative pain (mild, moderate, severe)
Secondary haemorrhage (seen in out-patients)
Secondary haemorrhage (required admission)
Adequate colposcopy
Cervical stenosis
Dysmennorrhoea
Residual disease at 6, 12, 24 months
Notes 50 women randomised to laser conisation, 50 women randomised to laser ablation Haemostasis achieved by pressure with a cotton swab or Monsel solution
Laser Excision 2mm margin to lesion and to a depth of 2-3mm
Laser ablation to a depth of 10mm
Intra-cervical 3% prilocaine with octapressin used pre-operatively
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear Not reported
Allocation concealment? Yes “Patients were randomised to treatment … by drawing sealed envelopes”
Blinding?
All outcomes
Unclear Not reported
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Yes % of women analysed: 93/100 (93%) for residual disease By treatment arm
Laser conisation: 45/50 (90%)
Laser ablation: 48/50 (96%)
All other outcomes analysed all 100 patients
Free of selective reporting? Unclear Insufficient information to permit judgement
Free of other bias? Unclear Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists