Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD001318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub2

Comparison 2.

Laser ablation versus cryotherapy

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Residual Disease (All Grades of CIN) 6 935 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.73, 1.76]
2 Residual Disease (CIN1, CIN2, CIN3) 4 567 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.51 [0.91, 2.51]
 2.1 CIN1 4 73 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.75 [0.68, 11.11]
 2.2 CIN2 4 289 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.37 [0.65, 2.88]
 2.3 CIN3 4 205 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.38 [0.62, 3.09]
3 Peri-operative Severe Pain 3 493 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.00 [0.64, 6.27]
4 Peri-operative Severe Bleeding 2 305 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.83 [0.71, 47.96]
5 Vaso-motor Symptoms 1 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6 Malodorous Discharge 2 400 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.30 [0.12, 0.77]
7 Inadequate Colposcopy at Follow-up 2 272 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.26, 0.56]
8 Cervical Stenosis at Follow-up 2 464 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.45 [0.45, 4.73]