Comparison 9.
Knife cone biopsy: haemostatic sutures versus none
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Primary Haemorrhage | 2 | 522 | Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) | 0.42 [0.06, 3.23] |
2 Secondary Haemorrhage | 2 | 515 | Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) | 2.68 [1.27, 5.66] |
3 Cervical Stenosis | 2 | 307 | Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) | 1.75 [0.65, 4.72] |
4 Inadequate Colposcopy at Follow-up | 1 | Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) | Subtotals only | |
5 Dysmenorrhoea | 2 | 277 | Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) | 2.50 [1.41, 4.45] |