Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD001318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub2

Comparison 9.

Knife cone biopsy: haemostatic sutures versus none

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Primary Haemorrhage 2 522 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.42 [0.06, 3.23]
2 Secondary Haemorrhage 2 515 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.68 [1.27, 5.66]
3 Cervical Stenosis 2 307 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.75 [0.65, 4.72]
4 Inadequate Colposcopy at Follow-up 1 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5 Dysmenorrhoea 2 277 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.50 [1.41, 4.45]