Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD008053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008053.pub2

Comparison 1.

Planned home versus hospital care after PPROM

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Perinatal mortality (up to 7 days) 1 55 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.93 [0.19, 20.05]
2 Neonatal infection 1 55 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.15, 2.19]
3 Chorioamnionitis 2 116 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.37, 1.48]
4 Gestational age at birth (weeks) 1 55 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) −0.30 [−2.05, 1.45]
5 Latency period (days from PPROM to birth) 1 55 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 6.00 [−3.51, 15.51]
6 Caesarean section rate 2 116 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.28 [0.07, 1.15]
7 Induction of labour 1 61 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.53, 2.91]
8 Maternal days in hospital 2 116 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) −9.60 [−14.59, −4.61]
9 Respiratory distress syndrome 1 55 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.05, 5.01]
10 Mean birthweight (grams) 1 55 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) −170.0 [−558.30, 218.30]
11 NICU admission 1 55 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.39 [0.72, 2.71]
12 Mean total cost (US and Canadian $s) 2 116 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) −0.80 [−1.41, −0.19]