Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006114.pub2

1.6. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Fluvoxamine versus TCAs, Outcome 6 Depression scale ‐ Endpoint score: low=good (early phase) ‐ missing SDs or skewed data.

Depression scale ‐ Endpoint score: low=good (early phase) ‐ missing SDs or skewed data
Study Depression scale Fluvoxamine; mean SD n comparator; mean SD n Note
vs Imipramine
Amore 1989 HRSD‐21 22.6 missing 15 25.4 missing 11  
Asakura 2005 HRSD‐17 10.7 7.0 149 10.6 7.1 149 skewed.
Cassano 1986 HRSD‐17 13.4 missing 120 13.7 missing 119  
Claghorn 1996 HRSD‐21 21.1 missing 44 21.3 missing 44  
Fabre 1996 HRSD‐21 19 missing 46 18.3 missing 48  
Feighner 1989 HRSD‐17 12.5 missing 21 16.6 missing 27  
Guy 1984 HRSD‐17 14.2 missing 17 13 missing 16  
Itil 1983 HRSD‐16 12.7 8.2 9 10.4 6.8 14 skewed.
Koetsier 2002 HRSD‐17 19.4 9.7 27 15.5 8.0 25 skewed.
Lydiard 1989 HRSD‐17 18.6 missing 17 17.2 missing 18  
March 1990 HRSD‐17 15.9 missing 13 17.1 missing 15  
vs Clomipramine
Coleman 1982 HRSD‐17 8.8 missing 41 8.6 missing 43  
Ottevanger 1995 HRSD‐17 15.1 8.1 20 13.9 7.4 20 skewed.
vs Amitriptyline
Harris 1991a HRSD‐17 17.1 missing 29 10.0 missing 29  
Murasaki 1998a HRSD‐17 14.5 7.8 80 16.1 7.6 83 skewed.
vs Nortriptyline
Otsubo 2005 HRSD‐17 13.5 7.7 32 15.7 6.5 29 skewed.