Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006114.pub2

1.7. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Fluvoxamine versus TCAs, Outcome 7 Depression scale ‐ Endpoint score: low=good (acute phase) ‐ missing SDs or skewed data.

Depression scale ‐ Endpoint score: low=good (acute phase) ‐ missing SDs or skewed data
Study Depression scale Fluvoxamine; mean SD n comparator; mean SD n Note
vs Imipramine
Claghorn 1996 HRSD‐21 16 missing 44 15.5 missing 44  
Fabre 1996 HRSD‐21 14.2 missing 46 14.3 missing 48  
Feighner 1989 HRSD‐17 10.5 missing 21 16.4 missing 27  
Guy 1984 HRSD‐17 13.0 missing 16 12.1 missing 16  
Lydiard 1989 HRSD‐17 12.8 missing 17 9.0 missing 18  
March 1990 HRSD‐17 12.5 missing 13 13.8 missing 15  
vs Clomipramine
de Wilde 1983 HRSD‐17 6.4 missing 21 5.1 missing 21  
Zohar 2003 HRSD‐17 13.4 missing 42 12.3 missing 42  
vs Amitriptyline
Barge‐Schaapveld 1995 HRSD‐17 10.0 5.2 11 8.6 8.0 10 skewed.
Harris 1991a HRSD‐17 10.4 missing   6.6 missing 26  
Kostiukova 2003 HRSD‐17 7.4 missing 30 6.7 missing 30  
Remick 1994 HRSD‐17 8.7 7.2 13 10.3 6.0 10 skewed.
vs Nortriptyline
Otsubo 2005 HRSD‐17 11.9 8.9 36 12.1 5.9 38 skewed.
vs Dothiepin
Mullin 1988 HRSD‐17 8.3 missing 26 8.5 missing 24  
Rahman 1991 MADRS 13.5 missing 19 14.4 missing 21  
vs Desipramine
Tourigny‐Rivard 1996 HRSD‐17 4.9 missing 22 10.8 missing 25