1.9. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Fluvoxamine versus TCAs, Outcome 9 Depression scale ‐ Change score: decrease=good (early phase) ‐ missing SDs.

Depression scale ‐ Change score: decrease=good (early phase) ‐ missing SDs
Study	Depression scale	Fluvoxamine; mean	SD	n	comparator; mean	SD	n	Note
vs Imipramine
Amore 1989	HRSD‐21	‐3.1	missing	15	‐3.4	missing	11
Bramanti 1988	HRSD‐21	‐11.1	missing	28	‐10.4	missing	30
Cassano 1986	HRSD‐17	‐12.2	missing	120	‐12.2	missing	119
Claghorn 1996	HRSD‐21	‐5	missing	44	‐4.6	missing	44
Fabre 1996	HRSD‐21	‐8.7	missing	46	‐8.2	missing	48
Feighner 1989	HRSD‐17	‐12.5	missing	21	‐10.6	missing	27
Guy 1984	HRSD‐17	‐10.4	missing	17	‐12.1	missing	16
Itil 1983	HRSD‐17	‐7.6	missing	9	‐11.5	missing	14
Koetsier 2002	HRSD‐17	‐7.6	missing	27	‐12.2	missing	25
Lydiard 1989	HRSD‐17	‐5.9	missing	17	‐8.2	missing	18
March 1990	HRSD‐17	‐9.1	missing	13	‐8.4	missing	15
vs Clomipramine
Coleman 1982	HRSD‐17	‐16.6	missing	41	‐16	missing	43
de Wilde 1983	HRSD‐17	‐6.9	missing	22	‐6.5	missing	21
Dick 1983	HRSD‐17	‐11.7	missing	15	‐8.6	missing	13
Ottevanger 1995	HRSD‐17	‐11.3	missing	20	‐11.8	missing	20
Zohar 2003	HRSD‐17	‐10.8	missing	42	‐9.8	missing	42
vs Amitriptyline
Barge‐Schaapveld 1995	HRSD‐17	‐6.6	missing	12	‐8.2	missing	10
Kostiukova 2003	HRSD‐17	‐5.3	missing	30	‐8.6	missing	30
Murasaki 1998a	HRSD‐17	‐8.4	missing	80	‐7.5	missing	83
Remick 1994	HRSD‐17	‐6.6	missing	13	‐6.9	missing	9
vs Desipramine
Nathan 1990	HRSD‐17	‐8.4	missing	17	‐9.3	missing	18
vs Dothiepine
Mullin 1988	HRSD‐17	‐6.5	missing	26	‐7.2	missing	24
Rahman 1991	MADRS	‐10.2	missing	19	‐7.9	missing	21