Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006114.pub2

4. Ratio of ORs from MTM and this review.

Outcomes OR (95%CI) Ratio of ORs*
MTM (direct + indirect comparisons) (Cipriani 2009) Direct comparisons (This review)
Response
paroxetine 0.96 (0.76 to 1.23) 0.83 (0.51 to 1.34) 1.16
sertraline 0.79 (0.61 to 1.01) 1.21 (0.53 to 2.75) 0.65
fluoxetine 0.98 (0.77 to 1.23) 1.00 (0.62 to 1.61) 0.98
citalopram 0.88 (0.68 to 1.16) 0.90 (0.50 to 1.62) 0.98
milnacipran 0.97 (0.68 to 1.37) 0.57 (0.26 to 1.23) 1.70
venlafaxine 0.77 (0.59 to 0.99) 0.40 (0.18 to 0.92) 1.93
mirtazapine 0.71 (0.55 to 0.92) 0.88 (0.59 to 1.31) 0.81
Total dropout
paroxetine 1.10 (0.84 to 1.47) 1.08 (0.63 to 1.85)** 1.02
sertraline 1.38 (1.03 to 1.89) 1.46 (0.19 to 11.16)** 0.95
fluoxetine 1.22 (0.93 to 1.61) 1.17 (0.66 to 2.09)** 1.04
citalopram 1.37 (1.01 to 1.85) 1.42 (0.75 to 2.67) 0.96
milnacipran 1.18 (0.76 to 1.75) 1.22 (0.54 to 2.77)** 0.97
venlafaxine 1.14 (0.86 to 1.54) 2.29 (0.97 to 5.43) 0.50
mirtazapine 1.18 (0.87 to 1.61) 0.83 (0.52 to 1.33) 1.42
MTM, multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval;
 For response, ORs higher than 1 favor fluvoxamine. For total dropout, ORs lower than one favour fluvoxamine;
 * ORs of this review as reference;
 **Data from three comparisons (Ansseau 1991a, Ansseau 1991b, and Gonul 1999) were omitted because these 4‐week trials were not included in MTM (Cipriani 2009).