Cassano 1986.
Methods | Four‐week double blind, multicentre, randomised study. | |
Participants | Psychiatric in‐ and outpatients meeting DSM‐III for major affective disorder, with a minimum baseline score of 15 on the HDRS‐17. Age range: 19‐70 years old. Exclusion criteria: child bearing potential or pregnant women; antidepressant therapy in the past 2 weeks; ECT within the last month; depressive symptoms secondary to other psychiatric illness; dependence upon licit or illicit drugs; serious organic diseases; need for concurrent medications which could interact with the study drugs or obscure their effects; patients unwilling or unable to cooperate with the study. | |
Interventions | Fluvoxamine: 169 participants.
Imipramine: 161 participants.
Placebo: 151 participants.
Fluvoxamine dose range: 50‐300 mg/day.
Imipramine dose range: 50‐300 mg/day. Chloral hydrate or flurazepam as hypnotics were allowed during the trial. |
|
Outcomes | HDRS‐17, CGI‐I, CGI‐severity, BPRS, SCL‐90, SDS. Total dropout, dropout due to inefficiency, dropout due to side effects, side effect profile. |
|
Funded by pharmaceutical companies | Funded by pharmaceutical company markets fluvoxamine. | |
Fluvoxamine as an investigational or comparator drug | As an investigational drug. | |
Notes | Patients with major affective disorder (DSM‐III) were included, so there might be some bipolar depression, but correct number was not reported. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomized". no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "double‐blind", no further details. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Study endpoint: 67/169 missing from fluvoxamine group (12 due to lack of efficacy, 19 due to adverse effects); 57/161 missing from control group (10 due to lack of efficacy, 17 due to adverse effects). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | SDs of endpoint/change score for depression were not reported. |