Gonul 1999.
Methods | Four‐week double blind, randomised study. | |
Participants | Patients with major depression (DSM‐IV). Age: mean 35.6 years old (SD 11.8). Exclusion criteria: psychotic symptoms, catatonia. | |
Interventions | Fluvoxamine: 40 participants. Fluoxetine: 40 participants. Paroxetine: 40 participants. Sertraline: 40 participants. Fluvoxamine dose: 150 mg/day. Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day. Paroxetine dose: 20 mg/day. Sertraline dose: 50 mg/day. | |
Outcomes | HRSD. Total dropout, dropout due to side effects. |
|
Funded by pharmaceutical companies | Unclear. | |
Fluvoxamine as an investigational or comparator drug | Unclear. | |
Notes | Patients with "major depression" (DSM‐IV) were included, so there might be some bipolar depression, but correct number was not reported. No clinical efficacy data could be entered in a meta ‐analysis; study authors reported only as "When the number of patients responding therapy was taken into account for the efficacy to each SSRI, we could not find any significant difference among them". |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomized", no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "single blind", no further details. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Study endpoint: 3/40 missing from fluvoxamine group (3 due to adverse effects); 4/40 missing from fluoxetine group (4 due to adverse effects); 6/40 missing from paroxetine group (6 due to adverse effects); 4/40 missing from sertraline group (6 due to adverse effects). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Results of HRSD were not reported. |