Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006114.pub2

Perez 1990.

Methods Six‐week double blind, multicentre, randomised study.
Participants Psychiatric outpatients meeting DSM‐III for major depressive episode, with a minimum baseline score of 30 on the MADRS.
 Age range: 18 years old or more; mean 41.6 years old.
 Exclusion criteria: pregnant or at risk of becoming pregnant, breast feeding; strong suicide potential; major physical disorders such as epilepsy, hepatic or renal disease.
Interventions Fluvoxamine: 30 participants.
 Mianserin: 33 participants.
 Fluvoxamine dose range: 100‐300 mg/day
 Mianserin dose range: 60‐180 mg/day.
No other form of antidepressant medication was allowed during the trial period.
Outcomes MADRS, CGI‐I, Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire.
Total dropout, dropout due to inefficiency, dropout due to side effects, side effect profile.
Funded by pharmaceutical companies Funded by pharmaceutical company markets fluvoxamine.
Fluvoxamine as an investigational or comparator drug Unclear.
Notes Patients with major depressive episode (DSM‐III) were included, so there might be some bipolar depression, but correct number was not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomized", no further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind", no further details.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Study endpoint: 9/30 missing from fluvoxamine group (1 due to lack of efficacy, 6 due to adverse effects); 9/33 missing from control group (2 due to lack of efficacy, 5 due to adverse effects).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk SDs of endpoint/change score for depression were not reported.