Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006114.pub2

Rahman 1991.

Methods Six‐week double blind, multicentre, randomised study.
Participants Patients meeting DSM‐III for major depressive episode, with a minimum baseline score of 29 on the MADRS.
 Age range: 61‐86 years old.
 Exclusion criteria: concurrent depressive delusions or stupor; depression secondary to other psychiatric illness, according to DSM‐III; narrow angle glaucoma; symptoms suggestive of prostatic hypertrophy; history of epilepsy, myocardial infarct within 3 months of entry into the study or any degree of heart block or other clinically significant arrhythmia.
Interventions Fluvoxamine: 26 participants.
 Dothiepin: 26 participants.
 Fluvoxamine dose range: 100‐200 mg/day.
 Dothiepin dose range: 100‐200 mg/day.
Hypnotic and anxiolytic medication was allowed during the study, but other antidepressants were not.
Outcomes MADRS, CGI‐I, Newcastle Scale.
Total dropout, dropout due to side effects, number of patients experiencing at least one side effect.
Funded by pharmaceutical companies Funded by pharmaceutical company markets fluvoxamine.
Fluvoxamine as an investigational or comparator drug Unclear.
Notes Patients with major depressive episode (DSM‐III) were included, so there might be some bipolar depression, but correct number was not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomized", no further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind", no further details.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Study endpoint: 9/26 missing from fluvoxamine group (2 due to adverse effects); 7/26 missing from control group (2 due to adverse effects).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk SDs for endpoint score and change score were not reported.