Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 14;13(46):6208–6212. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i46.6208

Table 5.

Comparisons of sensitivity and specificity of UTDT in AP in present study with those reported previously

Reference Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Kemppainen et al 1997[29] 94 95
Kylanpaa-Back et al 2000[28] 96 92
Lempinen et al 2001[5] 62 87
Pezzilli et al 2001[27] 53.3 -
Lempinen et al 2003[7] 72 81
Chen et al 2005[16] 89.6 85.7
Saes et al 2005[30] 68 86.4
Present study 91 72