Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jun 8;411:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.020

Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.

Absolute eosinophil counts are significantly different between each eosinophilic group and the normal donor group (P < 0.0001). AEC is also significantly different between the FIP1L1-PDGFRA/JAK2 group and the PARA (P = 0.0279) group as well as between the FIP1L1-PDGFRA/JAK2 group and the HEUS group (P = 0.0076).

Diagnosis Median Age
(range)
Sex (M / F) GMa Eosinophils × 109/L (range)
HES/LHES (n = 13) 58 (17 – 82) 9 / 4 5.183 (1.514 – 60.920)
FIP1L1-PDGFRA/JAK2 (n = 9) 35 (17 – 78) 8 / 1 5.970 (2.425 – 11.821)
PARA (n = 10) 28.5 (21 – 71) 5 / 5 2.948 (1.071 – 10.400)
HEUS (n = 10) 54.5 (18 – 74) 7 / 3 2.864 (1.340 – 6.390)
EAE (n = 2) 27 (21 – 33) 2 / 0 Not Applicable
EGID (n = 11) 34 (22 – 54) 9 / 2 0.173 (0.070 – 0.470)
ND (n = 19) 34 (26 – 81) 12 / 7 0.133 (0.039 – 0.390)b
a

GM indicates geometric mean

b

Absolute eosinophil counts were available for 14 of the 19 ND.