Skip to main content
. 2001 Oct 23;2001(4):CD003602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003602

Hedstrom 1996.

Methods Design: Randomised controlled trial. 
 Setting: Sweden.
Participants N = 80 patients undergoing total hip replacement for primary coxarthrosis (78 patients included in the analysis).
  • PAD group = M/F = 15/23; mean age ± SD = 71 ± 5 years

  • Control group = M/F=6/34; mean age ± SD = 71 ± 5 years


Inclusion/Exclusion criteria: Patients with hepatitis, severe coronary artery disease or heart failure, haematologic diseases, Hb concentration < 110 g/L or body weight < 50 kg were not eligible.
Interventions
  • PAD group (n = 38)

  • Control group (n = 40)


Timing of autologous blood collection/retransfusion: one 4 weeks before surgery and the other 2 weeks before the scheduled operation. The blood was stored at +4.0 degrees celsius for not more than 6 weeks and was handled according to existing routines and regulations for allogeneic blood. All autologous blood, as well as the allogeneic blood, was retransfused as packed red blood cells (leukocyte depleted blood) if needed. 
 Volume of autologous blood collected/retransfused: autologous group donated 2 units of blood. 
 Iron supplementation: All patients received iron supplementation consisting of 100 mg Fe2+ given orally 2 times a day after the first donation until the day of the operation. 
 Use of transfusion threshold: Not reported. 
 Length of surgery: Average of 107 and 97 minutes in PAD and control groups respectively.
Outcomes Outcomes reported: Number of patients exposed to allogeneic blood (n), allogeneic blood transfused (units), blood loss (mL), haemostatic parameters (bleeding times).
Notes Period of study: Not reported. 
 Length of study: Not reported. 
 A priori sample size: Not reported. 
 Baseline comparability: Not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk No information.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Patients were randomly allocated by the use of sealed envelopes.
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information.
Intention‐to‐treat analysis? High risk Data were not analysed on an intention‐to‐treat basis.