Methods | Randomised controlled trial, individual women. | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Experimental intervention: umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound
Control/comparison intervention: routine care, no Doppler ultrasound
Multiple estimations were at 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation. |
|
Outcomes | Main outcome: obstetric intervention rate, short-term neonatal morbidity | |
Notes | Leeds (UK) 1993 study in previous version of the review (Bricker 2007). | |
Risk of bias | ||
Item | Authors’ judgement | Description |
Adequate sequence generation? | Yes | “Tables of random numbers were used to generate each random permuted block.” |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear | “…opaque numbered envelopes which were opened on the fetal assessment unit by a radiographer who had no personal knowledge of the women or her history.” No mention if enveloped were sealed. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes |
Yes | Describe any loss of participants to follow up at each data collection point:
Describe any exclusion of participants after randomisation:
|
Free of selective reporting? | Unclear | We did not assess the trial protocol. |
Free of other bias? | Unclear | If the study was stopped early, explain the reasons:
Describe any baseline in balance:
Describe any differential diagnosis:
|