Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul 23;2001(3):CD001360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001360

Comparison 4. INDIVIDUAL PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY versus GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Global impression: 1. Returned to hospital (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 at 12 months 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.58, 1.98]
1.2 at 24 months 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.72, 1.86]
2 Global impression: 2. Not improved at 24 months 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.96, 1.67]
3 Global impression: 3. Discharged from therapy (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 at 12 months 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.18, 3.18]
3.2 at 24 months 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.6 [0.33, 1.09]
4 Global impression: 4. Remaining in therapy (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 at 12 months 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.46, 1.00]
4.2 at 24 months 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.20, 1.54]