Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 8;109(9):1531–1540. doi: 10.1111/add.12623

Table 3.

Associations between quitting method and abstinence

(1) versus (2) (1) versus (3)
Model 1: OR (95% CI) Model 1: OR (95% CI)
Model 2: OR (95% CI) Model 2: OR (95% CI)
Model 3: OR (95% CI) Model 3: OR (95% CI)
(1) e-Cigarettes (2) NRT over-the-counter (3) No aid Model 4: OR (95% CI) Model 4: OR (95% CI)
Full sample (n = 5863)
% (n) Self-reported non-smoking 20.0 (93/464) 10.1 (194/1922) 15.4 (535/3477) 2.23 (1.70–2.93)*** 1.38 (1.08–1.76)*
1.88 (1.40–2.52)*** 1.21 (0.92–1.58)
1.63 (1.17–2.28)** 1.62 (1.19–2.19)**
1.63 (1.17–2.27)** 1.61 (1.19–2.18)**
Subsample: quit attempt started ≤26 weeks (n = 3784)
% (n) Self-reported non-smoking 20.3 (72/354) 11.0 (135/1222) 14.6 (323/2208) 2.06 (1.50–2.82)*** 1.49 (1.12–1.98)**
1.80 (1.27–2.55)*** 1.39 (1.01–1.90)*
1.56 (1.06–2.29)* 1.88 (1.32–2.68)***
Subsample: quit attempt started >26 weeks (n = 2079)
% (n) Self-reported non-smoking 19.1 (21/110) 8.4 (59/700) 16.7 (212/1269) 2.56 (1.49–4.42)*** 1.18 (0.72–1.94)
1.98 (1.11–3.53)** 0.91 (0.54–1.55)
1.64 (0.83–3.24) 1.10 (0.59–2.06)

Model 1 = unadjusted; model 2 = adjusted for age, sex, social grade, time since quit attempt started, quit attempts in the past year, abrupt versus gradual quitting and year of the survey; model 3 = adjusted for the variables from model 2 and time spent with urges to smoke and strength of urges to smoke; model 4 = adjusted for the variables from model 3 and the interaction terms time since last quit attempt started × time spent with urges and time since last quit attempt started × strength of urges to smoke. NB: for the two subsample analyses, model 4 is redundant, as there is no variation in the time since quit attempt.

*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01;

***

P < 0.001.

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; NRT = nicotine replacement therapy.