Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD004172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004172.pub2
Methods Generation of allocation sequences was made by a table of 52 random numbers with prospective assignment of patients. Concealment of treatment allocation was not described. Investigators recruiting patients were unaware of the treatment group to which patients would be assigned. Eight patients were withdrawn from the study
Participants 52 repeat open-heart surgery patients were randomised to one of two groups:
  1. Platelet-rich plasmapheresis: n = 25; M/F = not reported; mean (+/−SD) age = 64 (11) years.

  2. Control group: n = 19; M/F = not reported; mean (+/−SD) age = 77 (15) years

Interventions
  1. Platelet-rich plasmapheresis (PRP) harvesting 15 ml/kg was performed after the establishment of appropriate invasive monitoring and intravascular access using Haemonetics Plasma Saver®.

  2. Control group were managed without PRP.


NB: Patients in both groups received intra- and post-operative cell salvage
Outcomes Number of patients transfused allogeneic blood (n).
Units of allogeneic blood transfused.
Blood loss (mls).
Haematological levels.
Coagulation levels.
Hypotension during procedure (n).
Re-operation for bleeding (n).
Notes Quality assessment score (Schulz criteria): 2/7
Transfusion protocol used.
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Yes Random number table was used to randomise patients
Allocation concealment? Unclear B - Unclear
Blinding?
All outcomes
Yes Although investigators recruiting patients were unaware of the treatment group to which patients would be assigned the control group received standard treatment with no PRP treatment. Study was assessed as being single blinded