Kenealy 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods	Cluster RCT
Participants	Outpatient general practices, Auckland, New Zealand 2662 patients, 52 providers, 33 practices
Interventions	Icon suggesting diabetes screening for patients considered eligible for screening
Outcomes	Process adherence (testing)
Co‐Interventions	Educational: Distribution of educational materials and single educational session for providers in both control and interventions groups Beyond Clinician Education: None
CDSS Features ‐ Acknowledgement of CDSS Required	No
CDSS Features ‐ Other	Conveyed patient‐specific information, makes care recommendation, 'pull' mode of delivery, targeted underuse
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Low risk
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk
Baseline characteristics similar?	Low risk
Unit of analysis error	Low risk