Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;4:CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub3
Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 25 patients were studied prospectively following acute injury and haemorrhage. These patients were randomised to 1 of 2 groups:
  • Liberal group: n = 13; mean age = 46.9 years

  • Restrictive group: n = 12; mean age = 46.5 years

Interventions
  • Liberal group had their Hct brought up to 40% slowly over a period of several hours by the infusion of packed red cells

  • Restrictive group had their Hct maintained close to 30% by the appropriate administration of packed red cells


NB: all patients had sustained a Class III or Class IV haemorrhage and had clinical signs of shock (systolic blood pressure < 90 torr, heart rate >100 bpm or urine output < 20 ml/hr) before entry into the study. Patients were resuscitated according to the clinical protocol of the centre first using crystalloid to re-establish organ perfusion and haemodynamic stability and then giving sufficient packed red cells to achieve a Hct close to 30%. Patients were studied twice a day for 3 days after the period of haemorrhagic shock
Outcomes Outcomes reported: RBC consumption (units), cardiopulmonary parameters: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), intrapulmonary shunt, tissue oxygenation/perfusion, oxygen consumption/delivery, arterial and venous O2 saturations, arterial and venous O2 contents, cardiac index (CI), heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular stroke work index
Notes
Risk Of Bias
Bias Author’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Low risk Appears to have been complete
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk -
Other bias Low risk -