| Methods | 3-way randomisation of low-risk women (TA vs TC vs AC). A 2-way randomisation of high-risk women (TA vs TC). Central randomisation (unknown) with stratification for genetic risk | |
| Participants | 2 centres in Denmark from 1985-1990. Eligible low-risk women: age > 34 or father > 49, history of or anxiety about chromosomal abnormality, > 3 spontaneous miscarriages with viable fetus at 9-11 weeks. Eligible high-risk women: history of translocation, late termination or fetus at risk of metabolic disorder with a viable fetus at 9-11 weeks. Exclusions: active bleeding, intrauterine device, genital infection, severe mental illness, use of teratogenic drugs, history of neural tube defects and discrepant dating |
|
| Interventions | CVS vs second trimester AC. TA CVS vs second trimester AC. TC CVS vs second trimester AC. TC CVS vs TA CVS. |
|
| Outcomes | Pregnancy outcome, antenatal complications and diagnostic accuracy | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Item | Authors’ judgement | Description |
| Allocation concealment? | Yes | A - Adequate |