| Methods | Cluster RCT, with the hospitals as the unit of randomisation | |
| Participants | Obstetricians, family practitioners and nurse midwives from 18 hospitals. Intervention: n=9 and Control: n=9 Country: US Type of targeted behaviour: mothers’ intention to breast feed during the early postpartum period |
|
| Interventions | Intervention Local Opinion Leaders + audit & feedback + formal meetings + printed educational material. Method of opinon leader identification: both sociometric (Coleman et al. - If you wish to discuss practice questions with other clinicians in your hospital, on whom would you most likely call?) and Informant (opinion leaders in the study were nominated also by the obstetric nurse-manager). Proportion of social network that nominated OL: 56% Single OL or OL teams identified:single OL OL disseminated information: Formal OL frequency of involvement:2 hours monthly Control Standard dissemination |
|
| Outcomes | Mothers’ intention to breast feed | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Pg 414/Col 2/ Para 2 We randomly allocated hospitals between intervention and control groups and conducted the 1-year opinion leader intervention |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | It was a cluster RCT, with the hospitals as the unit of randomisation |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Not mentioned in the paper |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Not mentioned in the paper |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes mentioned in the methods section were also presented in the results |
| Other bias | Low risk | |
| Similar baseline outcome measures? | Unclear risk | Unclear if the baseline outcome measures are similar. |
| Similar baseline characteristics? | Unclear risk | Mentioned that the characteristics did not differ but did not report baseline data |
| Protection against contamination? | Low risk | Pg 415/ Col 2/ Para 1 As the setting where obstetric providers interact, the hospital was the appropriate unit of randomisation. To avoid contamination among Binghampton and Syracuse clinicians with admitting privileges at multiple hospitals in those cities, we treated as one unit for randomisation the three hospitals in the Syracuse area versus the two in Binghampton and one in the surrounding area We matched the18 remaining hospitals on characteristics that might affect breast feeding or avoided contamination of the control group by clinicians in the intervention group |