| Methods | Cluster RCT, with the community as the unit of randomisation | |
| Participants | Primary care practitioners from 6 community hospitals. 62 inpatients and 112 outpa-tients.Intervention: n=3 and Control:n=3 Country: US Type of targeted behaviour: general management of a problem (rheumatoid arthritis care) |
|
| Interventions | Intervention Local Opinion Leaders Method of OL identification: Sociometric Proportion of social network that nominated OL: NOT CLEAR Single OL or OL teams identified:teams of GPs, unclear number OL disseminated information: NOT CLEAR OL frequency of involvement: UNCLEAR Control Standard dissemination |
|
| Outcomes | Proportion of patients receiving appropriate care for rheumatoid arthritis | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Pg.847/Col 1/Para 1 Six communities were utilised in this program, and they were randomly assigned to a control or an intervention group |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | It was a cluster RCT, with the community as the unit of randomisation |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Not mentioned in the paper |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Not mentioned in the paper |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Do not say in the methods section which outcomes they will retrieve |
| Other bias | Low risk | |
| Similar baseline outcome measures? | Low risk | P.847/Table 1 |
| Similar baseline characteristics? | Unclear risk | P.848/Table 1 |
| Protection against contamination? | Low risk | The community was the unit of allocation. |