Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10;(8):CD000125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4
Methods Cluster RCT, with the community as the unit of randomisation
Participants Primary care practitioners from 6 community hospitals. 62 inpatients and 112 outpa-tients.Intervention: n=3 and Control:n=3
Country: US
Type of targeted behaviour: general management of a problem (rheumatoid arthritis care)
Interventions Intervention
Local Opinion Leaders
Method of OL identification: Sociometric
Proportion of social network that nominated OL: NOT CLEAR
Single OL or OL teams identified:teams of GPs, unclear number
OL disseminated information: NOT CLEAR
OL frequency of involvement: UNCLEAR
Control
Standard dissemination
Outcomes Proportion of patients receiving appropriate care for rheumatoid arthritis
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Pg.847/Col 1/Para 1
Six communities were utilised in this program, and they were randomly assigned to a control or an intervention group
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk It was a cluster RCT, with the community as the unit of randomisation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Not mentioned in the paper
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Not mentioned in the paper
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Do not say in the methods section which outcomes they will retrieve
Other bias Low risk
Similar baseline outcome measures? Low risk P.847/Table 1
Similar baseline characteristics? Unclear risk P.848/Table 1
Protection against contamination? Low risk The community was the unit of allocation.