Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;11(5):462–478. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2013.0873

Table 3.

microRNA Microarray Results of Vitellogenic Versus Nonvitellogenic Females

miRNA Vg/nVg (fold)
(A) Upregulated miRNAs
 miR-738 5.75
 miR-458 3.89
miR-19a 3.83
miR-19b 3.3
 ZF_n1_249 3.27
 miR-148 3.26
 miR-19d 3.22
miR-20a 2.04
 miR-457a 2.01
 miR-92b 1.9
 miR-93 1.75
miR-17a 1.74
 miR-456 1.74
 miR-19c 1.74
miR-92a 1.71
 miR-152 1.69
 miR-20b 1.65
 miR-30e 1.55
 miR-16b 1.42
(B) Downregulated miRNAs
 miR-146a 0.32
miR-200c 0.34
miR-200b 0.36
 miR-462 0.43
miR-141 0.45
 miR-221 0.45
 ZF_n1_302 0.46
miR-200a 0.47
 miR-146b 0.48
 miR-126 0.48
 miR-27c 0.48
 miR-24 0.49
 miR-107 0.51
 miR-27b 0.51
 miR-23a 0.53
 miR-214 0.53
 miR-23b 0.54
 miR-21 0.55
miR-429 0.57
 miR-150 0.58
 miR-145 0.59
 miR-27a 0.61
 miR-26b 0.67
 miR-26a 0.74
 miR-122 0.84

Microarray analysis (LC Sciences) results showing differentially expressed miRNAs (t-test, p<0.01) in livers of vitellogenic (Vg) compared to nonvitellogenic (nVg) female zebrafish (pooled samples of 32 fish).

Shown in bold are members of the miR-17-92 cluster (upregulated) and miR-200 superfamily (downregulated).